Our tests have shown an increase of 50% in levels of attention with the object, compared to without the object. Those are great news, but another problem arose- the object's motion is annoying and doesn't make the users want to use it again. In the upcoming weeks we will research motion and figure out which motion suits us best.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

After presenting our research work we concluded we must be more specific with our solution. Our first target was to help students maintain attentiveness during class, but now we ask ourselves do students really want to be focused in class? and if they do, how much are they willing to sacrifice to achieve it
Read more
We have defined our need- maintaining classroom attentiveness throughout a lecture. Weeks 2 and 3 were dedicated to research work and interviews. We have interviewed students and professors from different fields of study, in the hopes of noticing common behaviors leading to classroom distraction and techniques to maintain attentiveness. The majority of the interviewees are aware of their low attentiveness levels and wish to improve it. Our competitive analysis showed different aspects of the problem and various solutions. Most solutions are problematic. Some require high cognitive load, some require too much engagement. Some are too restrictive, and some simply do not work. On Sunday 18/11 we are presenting our research work to the lab. First, we present our need and why we think it is necessary. Then, we will show our validation process and competitive analysis in more detail, and at last- our vision. To help every student who is motivated to improve his classro...
Read more
Image
Experiencing with more mechanisms. We wanted to test how does it feel when the phone falls and bounces on different kinds of materials.
Read more